How were labour law enforcement ideas exchanged and adapted across borders? A new Call for Papers invites scholars to explore this question at a workshop organized by our researcher Johanna Wolf, John Howe (University of Melbourne), and Rebecca Zahn (University of Strathclyde). The event will take place at the University of Strathclyde on 11-12 September 2025 and will examine the historical development of dispute resolution and compliance mechanisms in labour law. The workshop aims to shed light on how enforcement ideas — ranging from arbitration and conciliation to trade union action and labour inspectorates — were shaped by international networks in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a unique legal experiment unfolded in Egypt, Syria/Lebanon, and Tangier. These regions, under semi-colonial control, established mixed courts—judicial bodies that blended local and foreign legal traditions to handle disputes involving foreigners. Aya Bejermi investigates how these courts operated as early forms of supranational law, influencing later international legal systems, including the foundations of European legal integration. Her study explores key questions: How did mixed court rulings evolve? How did lawyers and judges navigate competing legal traditions? And did this legal order leave a lasting imprint on modern supranational institutions?

The legal history of the British Empire is still in its early stages—but the newly released The British Empire in Comparative Legal Perspective helps bridge some of the gaps. Volume 25 of the Global Perspectives on Legal History explores legal transfer and legal geography across Australia, Canada, the United States, the Caribbean, East Asia, and East and South Africa. Arguing for a comparative approach, the book highlights how legislative and interpretative models were consciously adopted and adapted across imperial jurisdictions. The decolonization process further revealed both parallels and divergences in legal development.